Council Buys in to Exclusive Club

Telford and Wrekin Council's Buys in to Exclusive Club

In response to a Freedom of Information Request (FOIR) Telford and Wrekin Council has confirmed that they spent £14,550 of tax payers money buying into a little known exclusive club, NHT.


They have even been awarded the title of "Best in Region for Highways Satisfaction." through this little club.


This recognition, though seemingly commendable, has sparked a debate over the council's expenditure and the broader implications of the awards scheme by the NHT Network (National Highways and Transport Network).

The NHT Network, a subscription-based service, offers benchmarking services that allow its members to measure their own performance, and compare with others.


However, only 383 councils and local authorities have bought memberships, (approximately 37% of all Councils/LA's in the UK), making the award even less significant with 63% of the UK not buying in!


This significant expenditure of taxpayer money raises a crucial question: Why should a council invest in an awards scheme that excludes a majority of councils and requires a financial commitment to participate?


Given the limited participation rate, the validity and usefulness of the awards scheme come into question. Is it truly reflective of superior performance, or is it more a recognition of the ability and willingness to pay for membership?


Lack of Representation in Steering Groups

Further scrutiny reveals that Telford and Wrekin Council does not hold any positions on the NHT Network's steering groups. These groups are central to the organisation's operations and influence its strategic direction. The council's absence from these groups, both in membership and leadership roles, raises additional concerns:


Lack of Influence:

Without representation in the steering groups, Telford and Wrekin Council has no say in the decision-making processes that shape the benchmarking services. This could limit the council's ability to advocate for local needs and priorities effectively.

Questionable Benefits: 

With no direct involvement in the governance of the NHT Network, it is unclear how the council benefits from its membership beyond the benchmarking data provided. This further calls into question the justification for the substantial membership fee.


The Broader Implications

The scenario with Telford and Wrekin Council prompts a broader discussion on the validity and utility of such awards schemes in local government. While benchmarking and performance measurement are essential for service improvement, the exclusivity and cost associated with the NHT Network's membership can not be the most prudent use of public funds, especially when a majority of councils are not participating.


Conclusion

In light of these findings, it is imperative to question the necessity and value of Telford and Wrekin Council's membership in the NHT Network. The council must provide transparent justifications for this expenditure and clarify how it translates into tangible benefits for local residents.


Additionally, there should be an exploration of alternative, more inclusive, and cost-effective methods for benchmarking and improving local services.


For now, the "Best in Region for Highways Satisfaction" award remains overshadowed by the pressing questions concerning its financial and strategic validity.


As the debate continues, local residents and stakeholders will undoubtedly be watching closely, seeking assurances that their council is making decisions that truly serve the community's best interests.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Veterans & Disabled Abandoned by Labour Government Already

Image
Sir Keir Starmer Announces New Cabinet, Key Groups Left Unrepresented & Election Promise Broken Over the weekend, Labour Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer unveiled his new cabinet of ministers, sparking a wave of reactions across the political spectrum. One of the most glaring omissions in Sir Keir's cabinet is the lack of ministerial representation for both armed forces veterans and the disabled. Despite the growing calls for inclusive governance, there is neither a Disabilities Minister nor a Veterans Minister in the newly formed cabinet. This has led to questions about the Labour government's commitment to addressing the unique challenges faced by these communities. During the election campaign, Starmer was asked if he would have someone in his Cabinet responsible for veterans, his response was "Yes, we will. I think it's very important". Edit 10th July 2024 - a parlimentary under secretary was appointed on the 9th of July. However, they do not sit at Cabinet...
Read more

Labour's Railway Nationalisation

Image
Labour's Railway Nationalisation: A Partial Measure Masquerading as Full Reform Pic:ShaunDaviesStandingUpforTelford Labour's announcements on railway nationalisation, hailed by some as a bold move towards restoring public ownership, is under intense scrutiny for what critics argue is a misleading and partial measure.  The local Green Party of Telford and Wrekin brought these concerns to light on April 30, 2024, just five days after Labour's announcement on April 25. After a thorough examination, it became evident that Labour's plan fails to deliver the comprehensive nationalisation that the public might expect, instead leaving significant profitable sectors in private hands while placing the burden of unprofitable parts on taxpayers. Green Party Article 30Apr24 Continuing Private Franchises One of the most glaring issues with Labour's plan is its failure to end private franchising immediately. Notably, contracts like the Transport UK East Midlands franchise are set ...
Read more

Reform Party UK Ltd: A Troubling Approach to Candidate Selection

Image
Reform Party UK Ltd: A Troubling Approach to Candidate Selection The Reform Party UK Ltd has recently announced its candidate for the London Mayoral elections, sparking significant controversy due to the questionable background of their chosen representative. The party's decision to nominate convicted criminal Ant Middleton raises serious concerns about its candidate selection and acceptance procedures. Middleton, who has served prison time for unlawful wounding and common assault on two separate police officers, has been presented as a viable option to lead one of the most prominent cities in the world. This decision reflects poorly on the party's judgment and its commitment to integrity in public office. Ant Middleton, who served in the British Army and the Royal Navy, has also presented television, and is no stranger to controversy. Despite his military service, his criminal record paints a troubling picture. The fact that he was convicted of violent offenses against police ...
Read more