Telford GUARDIAN

Telford MP Shaun Davies Criticised for Prevarication on Two-Child Benefit Cap In the ever-evolving landscape of British politics, decision-making remains a critical skill, yet many politicians appear to struggle with it.  This observation rings particularly true for Labour MP Shaun Davies of Telford, whose response to the controversial two-child benefit cap has been met with skepticism. The two-child benefit cap, a policy that limits financial support for families to their first two children, has stirred considerable debate. While some politicians have taken clear stances, either supporting or opposing the cap, Davies seems to have fallen into the camp of prevarication—a choice that may not bode well for his long-term political future. Picture: ©️Telford&WrekinCouncil Meet Shaun online 2023 Prevarication, the act of delaying decisions through committees and prolonged reviews, is often criticised as a tactic that impedes progress. This approach has been a hallmark of political d...

Labour Faces Backlash for Breaking Election Pledge on Badger Cull In a surprising turn of events to some ( but not those of us who have experienced it before ) the Labour Party, under Sir Keir Starmer, is facing significant criticism for considering an expansion of the controversial badger cull, despite a manifesto promise to end it.  The new government, just over a month into its tenure, is contemplating issuing a cull license in Cumbria, a move that has provoked outrage from voters who supported Labour for its environmental commitments. The badger cull, an initiative running for over a decade, has resulted in the deaths of more than 230,000 badgers across England. Labour's apparent reversal on this issue has sparked accusations of betrayal, particularly from wildlife advocates who believed the party would swiftly put an end to the practice. Former Badger Trust head, Dominic Dyer, expressed his dismay on social media, stating that Labour's actions suggest they have no intentio...

100 Day s Labour Highlights of  Day 1 to Day 50 (Good & Bad) Announced Rwanda cancelled (will we get money back as promised?) Alleged phone call to Israeli PM calling for ceasefire. Yvette Cooper rules out digital ID cards suggested by Blair - Lie. See day 18. Kings speech. Sir Keir names cabinet. No minister for Disabled, no minister for veterans as promised during election. Chancellor commits to private sector to build 1.5 million homes within 5 years. Wes Streeting meets with Jr Dr union. Starmer NATO summit defence spending pledge cast iron IF financial restraints allow (bit of a Non commitment then!) Will Allow Ukraine to use British munitions inside Russia £1bn for hypersonic missiles £87bn for defence Prisoners to be released after 40% time served 2 days after saying yes, U turns on allowing British munitions use in Russia. Weapons hockey cokey see 15th August day 41. Streeting confirms BETA blocker (hormone inhibitor used for teenagers) ban. BMA urges them to be allowed...

Rachel Reeves’ Housing Policy: A Controversial Shift in Labour’s Legacy Labour's Rachel Reeves, Chancellor under Keir Starmer, has unveiled a contentious plan to reshape the UK's housing landscape, proposing significant rent increases on social housing over the next decade. This move aims to align social housing rents with the higher rates of so-called affordable homes, ostensibly to fund the construction of more such housing without taxing the wealthy. However, critics are raising alarms about the detrimental effects on the poorest in society. The proposal has sparked fierce criticism, with opponents arguing that these "affordable" homes often remain far out of reach. By pricing homes at up to 90% of  currently inflated market rates, as opposed to social housing’s 50%, Reeves’ policy threatens to exacerbate the housing crisis by reducing genuinely affordable options. Critics warn that this approach could mark the end of social housing as a viable safety net. Rachel R...

Rachel Reeves' Economic Approach: Misguided or Misleading? Rachel Reeves, Labour's Chancellor of the Exchequer, often likens her economic strategy to managing a household budget, a comparison that raises significant concerns about her understanding of macroeconomics. This analogy, while relatable, oversimplifies the complexities of running a national economy and suggests either a fundamental misunderstanding or a deliberate attempt to mislead the public. The primary flaw in Reeves' approach is the fundamental difference between a government and a household: governments can create money, whereas households cannot. This means that the constraints on government spending are not the same as those on household budgets. Despite this, Reeves employs this analogy, potentially to make her policies more palatable, but it fails to hold up under scrutiny. Chris Dillow, an experienced economist, highlights two critical examples where Reeves' policies diverge from her household analo...

Poverty Pay at Our Council Labour Council Misuses Data to Deceive Sportsfield Saga 1 Sportsfield Saga 2 27 Years & Still Waiting - Sportsfield Saga 3 Council Bankrupt in 3 Years (2023) Malicious Reporting Proof Disabled anf Children are an Afterthought in Telford Telford Labour Ignore BSL week Telford Labour Making Child Poverty Worse Cllr Shaun Davies Changes Questions to Provide Non-Answer The Wynnstay Hunt and Telford Labour Telford Council Censorship

  Rachel Reeves: A Troubled Start as Labour Chancellor Rachel Reeves, the newly appointed Labour Chancellor, seems to be navigating a turbulent start, reminiscent of past missteps rather than forging a progressive path forward. Her decisions so far have been met with criticism, as she misses opportunities to implement transformative policies that could define her tenure. One of the most glaring omissions is her reluctance to tackle inequality head-on. Reeves could have made a bold move by announcing the removal of the two-child cap, a policy that has long exacerbated inequality. Such a step could have signaled a commitment to social justice—a cornerstone of Labour values. Additionally, she had the chance to fund the Green New Deal, a vital initiative for combating climate change and creating sustainable jobs. The resources for these initiatives are available, yet Reeves remains silent on these fronts, raising questions about her priorities. Instead, Reeves appears to be channeling ...

Overstepping Civil Liberties: Telford & Wrekin Council's Controversial Use of Biometric Surveillance In an era where technology permeates every facet of our lives, Telford & Wrekin Council's  recent decision  to fund and install advanced ID scanners at social venues has ignited a fierce debate over the delicate balance between public safety and civil liberties. Endorsed by the Labour council and local police, this initiative aims to bolster security at nightlife venues through the use of artificial intelligence, facial recognition, and fingerprint scanning. However, critics contend that this approach grossly oversteps the bounds of acceptable surveillance, infringing upon individual freedoms and privacy. False Positives and Negatives A significant concern with this technology is its notorious inaccuracy. Between 2016 and 2023, facial recognition systems used by the Met and South Wales Police were over 85% inaccurate, leading to more than 3,000 wrongful identifications....