Faltering Campaign on Dog Fouling

Lawley and Overdale Parish Council’s Faltering Campaign on Dog Fouling: 

A Community’s Perspective

Local campaigners, have brought to light several critical issues with Lawley and Overdale Parish Council’s anti-dog fouling campaign. The council, led by Councillor Lewis, has faced scrutiny for what many residents see as a lackluster effort to tackle the persistent problem of dog fouling in the area.

Suggested Campaign Video by Truth Tracker Telford and LNTF3 here - 

 TTTPoopScoopCampaignVid 

However, what we had delivered - 

Community Support: Fact or Fiction?

Councillor Lewis has asserted that the initiative has garnered substantial backing from the local community, especially Newdale Primary School.

However, those claims have been questioned, by pointing out that only seven children from one school have participated, which hardly constitutes substantial backing for a parish with over 12,000 residents, and approximately 1600 pupils.


The council has also cited support from community events such as the Tea and Toast gatherings on Fridays at the Carpenter Centre. Yet, with an average attendance of just 13 people—most of whom are not representative of the wider community due to the event’s timing and accessibility issues—this claim appears flimsy. These events do not provide a genuine community response but rather a very limited and unrepresentative one, at just 0.1% of the residents.


Voluntary Participation: A Double-Edged Sword

Councillor Lewis highlighted that the initiative allows for voluntary participation by schools. However, this merely underscores the council's failure to sell the project and effectively engage the community and promote the initiative among local schools.


Broader Strategy: Promises vs. Reality

Cllr Lewis has advised that the anti-dog fouling initiative is part of a larger strategy, which includes the deployment of Neighbourhood Enforcement Officers. Yet, according to local observations, these officers have been notably absent from patrols. This discrepancy between the council’s promises and the community’s reality further fuels the dissatisfaction.


The Path Forward: Evidence and Engagement

While Councillor Lewis claims the initiative has been successful and well-received, others actually

living in the community strongly disagree, viewing it as a missed opportunity.

To resolve these discrepancies, it would have been beneficial to present detailed supporting evidence, establish clear metrics of success, and facilitate mediated discussions.


Unfortunately, Councillor Lewis failed to offer any of these solutions, opting instead to shut down further engagement on the subject.


The number of engagements on social media suggests the campaign has not achieved the success claimed by the council. The frequent complaints about dirty wheels and shoes needing cleaning before entering homes serve as tangible evidence of the campaign's shortcomings.


Accountability at the Ballot Box

Councillors making claims without evidence to support them is unacceptable and should be remembered by the electorate at the ballot box.


With local campaigners holding the council accountable, it is clear that the community demands more than just empty promises—they seek genuine, effective action against dog fouling in Lawley and Overdale.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Legal:Reform Plan Debunked

Image
Big picture   Written by Mark Webster, former Regional Manager Government Services Detention/Deportation Contract-Home Office You CAN pass new UK laws, but you CAN'T wish away treaties we’ve signed or the way courts apply them. The headline policies—automatic detention, no real appeals, and sending people to countries that aren’t proven safe—will trigger court orders, delays, and big compensation bills. You will end up paying a lot without getting removals to actually happen. Key ideas in human terms Non‑refoulement : This is the core rule. The UK can’t send someone to a place where there’s a real risk they’ll be tortured or face inhuman treatment. It applies under the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), the Refugee Convention, and the anti‑torture treaty. That means:   You CAN'T deport people to obviously dangerous places (think Afghanistan or Eritrea) unless you have strong, up‑to‑date proof they’ll be safe. Courts have been crystal clear on this for decades. ...
Read more

Exposing Telford Labour’s Misleading Use of “Facts”

Image
Exposing Telford Labour’s Misleading Use of “Facts” Labour-led Telford and Wrekin Council recently tried to claim that the rise in Universal Credit claimants is unsustainable, in response to a question from The Green Party of Telford and Wrekin. Cllr Middleton (L) Cllr Lee Carter (R) But when Leader Cllr Lee Carter dodged the issue, choosing not to engage on a hot potato, he delegated responsibility to Labour Cllr Kelly Middleton. Neither Cllr Carter nor Cllr Middleton did their homework. In addition to the figures we’ve already provided , here are a few more that suggest Labour locally and nationally are pulling the wool over people’s eyes: For years, people have been moved from legacy benefits like ESA to Universal Credit. These numbers artificially inflate the “new” Universal Credit claimant counts. So far, about 2.5 million people have been migrated to UC, with many financially worse off as a result. However, around 400,000 have been moved off ESA and have not applied for, or s...
Read more

Rhetoric Vs Reality

Image
Rhetoric Vs Reality Exposing Wrekin Reform UK Ltd By Mark Webster. Former Regional Manager, Wackenhut Government Services Division. Responsible for Immigration Detention & Deportation, Police Custody Suites & Court Security. Recently, the Wrekin Reform UK Ltd Campaign Co-Ordinator, made a series of statements that raises significant concerns about immigration, crime, and cultural integration in the UK.  While his rhetoric aims to resonate with fear surrounding these issues, it is crucial to counter his claims with facts and a more nuanced understanding of the situation . Dissecting the Claims Border Control and Immigration Radford asserts that "we have no real border control" and that the Labour government has " opened the floodgates" for immigration . This statement is misleading. The UK has implemented various border control measures, especially following Brexit. The Home Office continues to enforce immigration laws and manage border security effectively. ...
Read more